Tuesday, November 11, 2003
More Actually
I went over to my parents for dinner and to watch Matrix Reloaded with Dad before we see the final installment later today. I’m still a little confused by the whole plot, but it took six viewings of the first one before I finally got it.
Anyway, Mom and I discussed Love Actually a little more - it still sucks. Simply awful. Really.
But we agreed there were some bright spots and there were several places where we laughed out loud - mostly the scenes with Hugh Grant, the scenes with Colin Firth were very sweet, Emma Thompson is just brilliant. That’s why it was so disappointing, because the rest of the movie was like some bad Cinemax soft core pr()n in some places.
***MORE SPOILERS FOLLOW IN THE MORE SECTION***
UPDATE: Movie Mom gave it an A. *ARGH* There’s no accounting for taste, I suppose. The one quote that alarmed me a little:
Families who see this movie should talk about how the characters handle their feelings of loss, longing, and fear.
Yeah, “families” who see this movie should not include children under the age of 17 because it’s rated R - for good reason.
Families who enjoy this movie will also enjoy the other Curtis movies as well as classic romantic comedies with more emphasis on romance than comedy like Moonstruck, Roman Holiday, and The Philadelphia Story.
I’m horrified that this crap was compared to those classics. Ick. Stick with
Four Weddings... and
Notting Hill if you have to see another Curtis movie.
1. There was the pair who work in pr()n. Their whole arc was cliched from beginning to end. They didn’t add anything to the overall story.
2. There was a 20-something fella who was convinced that if he got to the US he would have a lot of secks with beautiful American women. He departed for the States with a backback full of nothing but condoms. Again, not necessary to the overall story.
3. There was the Laura Linney arc, which was interesting and never resolved. They just kind of left it hanging. Were they going for realism? Maybe...I just felt like they forgot about it at the end.
4. The Alan Rickman-Emma Thompson arc was good. There was tension, the acting was great.
5. The Liam Neeson arc was good. His interaction with the kid who plays his stepson was really good. That was a sweet and poignant part of the story.
6. Hugh Grant as Prime Minister was hilarious - typical him. The addition of Billy Bob Thornton as the US President was ridiculous and distasteful, although we think they had that as a political statement. Whatever...
7. The Kiera Knightley arc was uncessary as well. But there was one scene towards the end that was so sweet, very romantic, and handled with excellence. And I did like her wedding scene in the beginning.
8. Colin Firth, like Hugh Grant, had a great arc. He’s fun to watch and plays vunerability so well.
So those good things should have been the movie. The rest ruined it for me. Really, the good points aren’t enough to redeem the bad to make it an enjoyable movie. Because there wasn’t enough of the good and there was way too much of the bad.
Don’t waste your money.
Done Speaking...
Posted by at 10:12 AM
(0) Trackbacks •
Permalink