No-Touch Hand Soap System - Redundant?

I saw an ad for Lysol’s No-Touch Hand Soap System the other day and I’ve been thinking about it ever since. Isn’t it kind of super germ-phobic to want a germ-free soap dispenser? I mean, you’re touching the soap dispenser in order TO WASH YOUR HANDS. Who cares if there are germs on the dispenser? YOU’RE WASHING YOUR HANDS. Am I missing something here?

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 03/16 at 03:14 PM
    All viewpoints are welcome. Please keep your comments profanity free. Do not flame others. HTML links will not work. Please just post any links as is in your comment.

    You must answer the captcha question in order for your comment to post. If you don't know the answer, let me know. I may or may not give it to you.

    I reserve the right to delete and/or edit objectionable comments. Be nice and have fun!



  1. I tend to agree with you but my hubby and kids think it’s super cool that we have an automatic soap dispenser.  They bought it together when on a solo Wal-Mart trip.  I just rolled my eyes.  It’s really funny when you’re trying to move it for whatever reason and it dispenses on your hand.

    Posted by Amy  on  03/16/10  at  04:44 PM
  2. The cool factor I get. But to market it for germ-freeness seems silly when the thing dispenses soap.

    Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  03/16/10  at  05:08 PM
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Next entry: From the Inbox: Asininity Ahead

Previous entry: The Boy is Nuts

<< Back to main