pregnancy

Tuesday, July 15, 2003

Brights™ Revisited

OK, I’ve done a little more reading, including the Brights™ FAQ page. There’s a list of things they say identify who a Bright™ is and their goals for the movement. One jumped out at me:

    To have the noun, Bright, in wide use as an identity label among those persons who are free of the supernatural and mystical. [bold emphasis is mine]
Here’s my take:

That they consider themselves free of faith (because while they use terms like “supernatural” and “mystical,” what they’re really talking about is faith; which is to believe that which you cannot see) makes me very sad.

At first I was a little perturbed, because to have secular people (which is how I think of those who aren’t spiritual (I hate the term religious)) name themselves “bright” gave the arrogant idea that those of us who are spiritual must not be bright. And that’s definitely a hot button for me - the idea that people of faith have checked their intellect at the door of the church to blindly follow God like idiotic lemmings. When in actual fact, many most people of faith (and I’m speaking mostly of Christians, since I am one and that’s my perspective on life and faith), especially the ones I know personally, are very smart and have used the brain that God gave them to critically think about what they believe, why they believe it, and how their beliefs fit into their world.

I’ve read in several places in the blogosphere a clear and distinctive disdain for Christians and yes, it bothers me. And I’m woman enough to admit that I’ve held similar disdain for those who don’t believe in God. For that I’m sorry, and I will try not to harbor that disdain again, because it’s insulting, unloving, and arrogant. And that is not how I, as a follower of Christ, am to be towards those who don’t follow Christ.

Which brings me to my original statement - this whole thing makes me sad. 

Posted by at 12:08 AM
(0) TrackbacksPermalink
Page 1 of 1 pages